<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jungle island</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diymiami.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/jungle-island/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diymiami.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/jungle-island/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kmclean</title>
		<link>http://diymiami.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/jungle-island/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>kmclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diymiami.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I can&#039;t help but feel that these guys really messed this whole thing up. They squandered local support, mis-marketed, and generally let their delusions of grandeur get in the way of some meaningful market research. Any good institutional marketer will tell you that tourists aren&#039;t enough to support a venue if you don&#039;t have local support. 

Since writing this post, I&#039;ve heard two more items of interest. 

The first is that the current owner bought the Parrot Jungle from it&#039;s original family owners not that long ago. This makes sense, as they completely mis-understood the legacy that made the park so great for so many years. Secondly, I&#039;ve heard from a source close to the park that they may be having trouble holding up their end of the municipal bond.

Given the depth of local antipathy, I&#039;m not surprised. I bet they wish they could have a do-over. I&#039;m not sure they every would have left Pinecrest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I can&#8217;t help but feel that these guys really messed this whole thing up. They squandered local support, mis-marketed, and generally let their delusions of grandeur get in the way of some meaningful market research. Any good institutional marketer will tell you that tourists aren&#8217;t enough to support a venue if you don&#8217;t have local support. </p>
<p>Since writing this post, I&#8217;ve heard two more items of interest. </p>
<p>The first is that the current owner bought the Parrot Jungle from it&#8217;s original family owners not that long ago. This makes sense, as they completely mis-understood the legacy that made the park so great for so many years. Secondly, I&#8217;ve heard from a source close to the park that they may be having trouble holding up their end of the municipal bond.</p>
<p>Given the depth of local antipathy, I&#8217;m not surprised. I bet they wish they could have a do-over. I&#8217;m not sure they every would have left Pinecrest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miamian</title>
		<link>http://diymiami.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/jungle-island/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Miamian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diymiami.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Man, if there&#039;s a single place that embodies everything stupid, wasteful, stupid, hokey, crooked, stupid and stupid in Miami it&#039;s Jungle Island. For the money they&#039;ve squandered trying to help bail out this (for-profit. at least in theory) place, the city might actually have tried to provide some culture - did I say that? - to its residents. But hey, why use taxes for the people when you can spend it on the private sector instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, if there&#8217;s a single place that embodies everything stupid, wasteful, stupid, hokey, crooked, stupid and stupid in Miami it&#8217;s Jungle Island. For the money they&#8217;ve squandered trying to help bail out this (for-profit. at least in theory) place, the city might actually have tried to provide some culture &#8211; did I say that? &#8211; to its residents. But hey, why use taxes for the people when you can spend it on the private sector instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
